[c-nsp] Vlan assignments

[sheaujiun]

Yes, it seems subjective but is there possibly a general idea that can be
provided? For now, I do not have give a detail plan, just introduce a
general concept.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:56 AM, raymondh (NSP) <raymondh.nsp at gmail.com>wrote:

> It's very subjective to one's environment.
>
>
> On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:53 PM, sheaujiun wrote:
>
>   Hi,
>>
>> I have a customer in a DSLAM/BRAS environment where they have 4 main
>> groups
>> of Vlans assignments - Data, Voice, Management and Other services.
>>
>> Currently there is not fixed rules as to how vlan ids are assigned to the
>> 4
>> main groups. It has come to a time the network has grown to a rather huge
>> size and they are trying to reassign the vlan assignments.
>>
>> Generally, the network is as such:
>>
>> DSLAM --> aggregation switch --> BRAS
>>
>> Is there a standard guideline as to how vlan assignments are to be
>> designed?
>> What considerates are needed?
>> e.g. Is there a need to consider how different vlans are to be terminated
>> into the the aggregation switch if they are running VPLS?
>>     How the BRAS will handle the vlans coming from the aggregation?
>>
>>
>> Sheau Jiun
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>