[c-nsp] broadcast address question

lee.e.rian at census.gov lee.e.rian at census.gov
Thu Nov 27 08:48:03 EST 2008


Either one works, but the all 1s broadcast address is more correct.  See
RFC-1122 Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Communication Layers

3.3.6  Broadcasts
 Hosts SHOULD use the Limited Broadcast address to broadcast to
 a connected network.

Lee


-----cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net wrote: -----

>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>From: chloe K <chloekcy2000 at yahoo.ca>
>Sent by: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>Date: 11/26/2008 09:48PM
>Subject: [c-nsp] broadcast address question
>
>Hi
>
> I got this info from sh int
> but how come the broadcast address is not
> 192,168,0.195
> and
> 192.168.0.165
> but those are 255.255.255.255
> in linux, those are 192,168,0.195 and 192.168.0.165
>
>
> router#sh ip interface
>FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet address is 192.168.0.193/30
> Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
>
> FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet address 192.168.0.164/30
> Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>
>
>Yahoo!         Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on         the
>web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list