[c-nsp] ASR terminating PPPoE

[Frank Bulk]

I know of a neighboring telco doing the same thing, but I was surprised they
bought an ASR because they have less than 2000 subscribers.

Can anyone comment on cost/session and when an ASR1000 has a better price
point than a Cisco 7206VXR with a G2?

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Roddy Strachan
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 6:23 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR terminating PPPoE

Actually testing/implementing one now.

One test we had about 12-13000 sessions on it, CPU was about 12%

That was a rough figure...



On 30/11/08 9:00 PM, "MKS" <rekordmeister at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Has anyone any experience using the ASR 100x as a bras, terminating pppoe.
> Some traffic/sessions vs CPU load info would be great (on or off list)
> Cisco clams up to 32.000 session, does that hold?
>
> Regards
> MKS
>


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this
email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
 any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
 author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/