[c-nsp] 6500 and MPLS

[Phil Mayers]

Gary Roberton wrote:
> Is anyone currently using a 6500 for MPLS duties?  Not VRF-Lite but PE
> duties (including NAT)?  If so, what are the pros and cons you have
> experienced.

We use MPLS on 6500s (but not NAT - ugh).  It works fine. No real surprises.

There's no VPLS support. Someone else has already mentioned the EoMPLS 
being port-based (or sub-int based, which if you have SXH and above you 
can combine with other non-EoMPLS SVIs on the port)