[c-nsp] c2960g: flash gone mad ?
Church, Charles
cchurc05 at harris.com
Thu Oct 16 10:33:33 EDT 2008
I believe the IOS is to blame. I saw a similar thing with 12.2(44)SE2
on 3550, I believe. The verify never worked, but MD5 verify did. I
don't remember the reload and signature issue though. I'm willing to
bet it'll work ok from here on out.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alexandre
Snarskii
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:21 AM
To: Cisco-NSP Mailing List
Subject: [c-nsp] c2960g: flash gone mad ?
Hi!
While trying to upgrade IOS on one of ours c2960g, I got strange
message:
SW088-022#verify flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin
File system hash verification failed for file
flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin(No such file or directory).
however, MD5 verification of the same file succeeded:
SW088-022#verify /md5 flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin
[....]
...................Done!
verify /md5 (flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin) =
27ad87f2c90595f3e682633c7985099a
Well, I tried to format flash:, and re-upload IOS image - results
were the same.
And then switch refused to reload 'by command':
SW088-022#reload
%ERROR: Not able to process Signature in flash:.
%ERROR: Aborting reload.
so, I had to visit equipment room and reboot it by power cycle
(booted normally, looks like that there are no signature check
on boot).
What is it ? Faulty flash ? Does not looks like - md5 check is just
fine...
And what to do with that switch ? Is it safe to leave it in network
(on office one, without remote reboot ability it not qualified to remote
installations) or better to RMA it ?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list