[c-nsp] c2960g: flash gone mad ?

Church, Charles cchurc05 at harris.com
Thu Oct 16 10:33:33 EDT 2008


I believe the IOS is to blame.  I saw a similar thing with 12.2(44)SE2
on 3550, I believe.  The verify never worked, but MD5 verify did.  I
don't remember the reload and signature issue though.  I'm willing to
bet it'll work ok from here on out. 

Chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alexandre
Snarskii
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:21 AM
To: Cisco-NSP Mailing List
Subject: [c-nsp] c2960g: flash gone mad ?



Hi!

While trying to upgrade IOS on one of ours c2960g, I got strange
message: 

SW088-022#verify flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin
File system hash verification failed for file
flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin(No such file or directory).

however, MD5 verification of the same file succeeded: 

SW088-022#verify /md5 flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin
[....]
...................Done!
verify /md5 (flash:c2960-lanbase-mz.122-46.SE.bin) =
27ad87f2c90595f3e682633c7985099a

Well, I tried to format flash:, and re-upload IOS image - results
were the same. 

And then switch refused to reload 'by command': 

SW088-022#reload 
%ERROR: Not able to process Signature in flash:.
%ERROR: Aborting reload.

so, I had to visit equipment room and reboot it by power cycle 
(booted normally, looks like that there are no signature check 
on boot). 

What is it ? Faulty flash ? Does not looks like - md5 check is just
fine... 
And what to do with that switch ? Is it safe to leave it in network 
(on office one, without remote reboot ability it not qualified to remote

installations) or better to RMA it ? 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list