[c-nsp] Sup720, SXH or SXF?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Oct 17 03:35:14 EDT 2008


Hi,

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:07:35PM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
> SXH3 hasn't really receive great praise from what I've heard so far.

Just to make that clear: except for the BGP ghosts and the scp crash bug,
we have *not* seen any nasties in SXH3/SXH3a yet (SXH3 non-modular).

We might have been lucky, though :-)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20081017/e79a5285/attachment.bin>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list