[c-nsp] mpls ldp discovery transport-address
Vikas Sharma
vikassharmas at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 00:25:03 EDT 2008
Hi,
Below is the output of sh mpls ldp discovery. Here LDP identifier and LDP
discovery source are different. I can change discovery source using "mpls
ldp discovery transport-address but my question here is what is the best
practice and what are the benefits? is it using both LDP identifier and
Discovery source same or different?
One of the benefit I can see is if I use the same IP for both is I can
reduce the number of labels. Any other benefit wrt security!!!
router1# sh mpls ldp discovery
Local LDP Identifier:
212.74.65.105:0
Discovery Sources:
Interfaces:
GigabitEthernet0/1 (ldp): xmit/recv
LDP Id: 212.74.65.124:0
GigabitEthernet0/2 (ldp): xmit/recv
LDP Id: 212.74.65.126:0
Targeted Hellos:
212.74.65.105 -> 212.74.65.124 (ldp): passive, xmit/recv
LDP Id: 212.74.65.124:0
212.74.65.105 -> 212.74.65.126 (ldp): passive, xmit/recv
LDP Id: 212.74.65.126:0
router1#sh mpls fo
router1#sh mpls forwarding-table | in 212.74.65.124
4560 Pop tag 212.74.65.124/32 0 Gi0/1 212.74.88.233
router1#sh mpls forwarding-table | in 212.74.65.105
router1#
Regards,
Vikas Sharma
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list