[c-nsp] Dreaded FIB Exception on Sup2

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:52:24PM -0700, Kevin Graham wrote:
> > Yeah but since the list price for the RSP720-3CXL is the same as the
> 
> > list price for the SUP720-3BXL, I don't see a reason not to go for the
> > RSP. Does one exist?
> 
> It's minimal, but RSP720-3CXL is going to require a "7600", though if you
> are willing to trade the MSFC4 for VSS, you can go with a VS-Sup720-3CXL.
> Either one is going to force you off of 12.2SXF.

Since the difference between 3B and 3C mainly seems to be "number of MAC
addresses", a Sup720-3BXL will usually do the job well enough.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080904/e569241b/attachment.bin>