[c-nsp] BGP Next-hope convergance
Saku Ytti
saku+cisco-nsp at ytti.fi
Mon Sep 8 05:55:53 EDT 2008
On (2008-09-08 11:24 +0200), Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 09:06 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > First of all, what are your RD values? You need to make sure RD values
> > are unique for each PE (use the IP:value format, instead of the
> > AS:value format commonly used).
>
> Does this have an effect on the convergence times? I seem to remember
> having been told that this is a good idea generally, but never really
> understood why. Can anybody shed light on why this is?
I'm not sure what you're asking.
1) why IP instead AS
- purely non-technical reasons. With IP you can do loop0:SAME
2) why multiple RD's
- so that RR best path algorithm doesn't kill your redundant or
load-balancing route. So that PE can install two or more routes.
--
++ytti
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list