[c-nsp] changing the number of equal-cost paths

[Rodney Dunn]

The packet loss would be very very minimal. Users most likely will
not even notice it.

Your biggest worry in these environments is the hw programming
resources and memory usage when you go with so many dual paths.
Just be aware of that and make sure your hw programming LC's
can support it.

Rodney


On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:59:40PM +0900, Takao Hotta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to change the number of ospf ecmp by using the
> maximum-paths command for up to six equal-cost paths on Cisco 12406.
> But I am worried about the impacts on routing/cef/connection for spf
> recalculation.  Things is it has 6 links now, but ecmp number was like
> default (four).  Anyone know any ideas for configuration change
> without packet loss/drops as much as possible?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> Takao
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/