[c-nsp] SXH3 ghost bugs - more details
Peter Taphouse
pete at bytemark.co.uk
Tue Sep 16 10:24:03 EDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Would you mind sharing the case number with me? I could forward this to
> our TAC engineer so they know "this is not just us".
>
> Do you have a bug ID?
I've got no bug ID, but it's on case SR 609537689. SXH3 introduced
another new bgp bug too - the output of show ip bgp neigh xx.xxx.xx.xx
advertised-routes produced badly wrong output. For example it showed us
announcing zero prefixes to one of our transit providers, even though
their looking glass showed them receiving them just fine :-/
That's why I opened the case originally, the ghosting bug I noticed
afterwards and then I quickly moved to SXF since it was causing too much
grief.
>> but it's causing us enough grief that I'm moving back to SXF until
>> things calm down.
>
> *grumble* - I would love to do that, given that we're quite happy with
> SXF since about two years now. But we were unlucky/stupid enough to
> get Sup720-10Gs for these new boxes, and they only run SHX...
Just to make you feel better, the 7604 I reloaded yesterday with SXF15
just spontaneously reloaded...
- --
Peter Taphouse
Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 (0) 845 004 3 004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIz8GDIAZ7OKeBB58RAi3zAKCaUsJbYjy6yRwx4796Yv9ko+hXTQCePYEB
UaQrHjlsOaFCeXKrjz7yTag=
=WgJ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list