[c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600

Tue Sep 16 21:24:13 EDT 2008

Cisco 7600 + ES20 are way too expensive on a price/port perspective.
Consider distributing smaller Cisco ME6524 boxes (which is not as
cheap as it used to be, but it is still lot less than 7600) instead of
large boxes like MX 960; if you really have the density to buy MX 960
instead of MX 240, I don't think there is anything on Cisco-land that
can match that.

Rubens

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Steven Mark <steven_mark_99 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> hello,
>
> We are a small ISP based out of Asia and we are considering above two products for carrier ethernet deployment. If anyone has done a comparitive study or have experience (support, feature-richness, IOS/JUNOS stability etc.).
>
> Thanks
> Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>