[c-nsp] ibgp convergence time ?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Sep 30 16:17:46 EDT 2008
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:14:50PM +0200, julien leroiso wrote:
>
> I have 2 bgp routers (named border1 and border2) with a ebgp session to one
> ISP (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) and ibgp session (xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and xxx.xxx.xxx.2).
>
> My border2 is very very slow to converge. After +-3h I didn't get all my
> border1 routes.
This is perfectly normal and to be expected.
In the following scenario:
ISP 1 -- border 1 -- border 2 -- ISP 2
border 1 will only send those routes to border 2 that are "best" via ISP1.
For those routes that border 1 will prefer via border 2 -> ISP 2, it
will not send its own prefixes back to border2.
(You can test this by shutting down the session border2 <-> ISP2. After
this, you should see all routes from border1 --> border2, and no routes
from border2 --> border1)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080930/27e731cb/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list