[c-nsp] Pseudowire and EtherChannel

[Elmar K. Bins]

vegasnetman at gmail.com (Ozar) wrote:

> Lets say I have customer who needs 2 gig from A to Z that I am going to
> transport by Pseudowire...
> 
> Should I etherchannel the ports and make my xconnect in the Port Channel
> interface, or just transport each gig interface separately, and customer
> handles all the aggregation?

I would not count on the packets arriving in-order. Pseudowire is usually
based on MPLS-switching, but it could also be tunnelled.

I'd do some dynamic routing including Multipath (for the balancing) on
the links.