[c-nsp] Pseudowire and EtherChannel
David Hughes
david at hughes.com.au
Sun Apr 5 20:00:06 EDT 2009
We have Multi Gig etherchannel bundles being delivered over multiple
port-based xconnects and it works just fine. The only tricky bit is
realising then you lose link at the far end (there's no link-loss
signaling on the pw). You'll need to run UDLD in aggressive mode so
that a failed circuit is removed from the bundle.
David
...
On 02/04/2009, at 8:35 AM, Ozar wrote:
> Quick question on PS and EtherChannel.
>
> Lets say I have customer who needs 2 gig from A to Z that I am going
> to
> transport by Pseudowire...
>
> Should I etherchannel the ports and make my xconnect in the Port
> Channel
> interface, or just transport each gig interface separately, and
> customer
> handles all the aggregation?
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list