[c-nsp] NAT on ASR1000
Frank Bulk
frnkblk at iname.com
Sun Apr 12 01:38:01 EDT 2009
Could the ASR1000 be the box that Cisco recommends for carrier IPv6 NAT
(i.e. IPv6 to IPv4 translations)?
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:47 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] NAT on ASR1000
Few bugs still being worked through but the 72xx and 76xx croaked
under the load:
ASR1002ESP10#sh proc cpu sort | excl 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 0%/0%; one minute: 0%; five minutes: 0%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
ASR1002ESP10#sh ip nat stat
Total active translations: 92367 (80 static, 92287 dynamic; 92287 extended)
Outside interfaces:
GigabitEthernet0/0/0, Tunnel1
Inside interfaces:
GigabitEthernet0/0/1, GigabitEthernet0/0/2
Hits: 0 Misses: 0
CEF Translated packets: 0, CEF Punted packets: 0
Expired translations: 87400847
that's on 12.2(33)XNC and I just filed one bug.
CSCsy93931 ASRNAT does not do FIN/RST/SYN timeout when no-payload keyword
used
My first work on the box with NAT but this thing seems pretty impressive.
Anyone else using it for high scale nat yet?
Rodney
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list