[c-nsp] GSR12008|GRP-B|4OC12/ATM-MM-SC|3GE-GBIC-SC throughput?
Jason Lixfeld
jason at lixfeld.ca
Tue Apr 14 18:22:03 EDT 2009
We have a box with the above specifications in production. 4
interfaces are being used; 2 ATM, 2 GigE.
SLOT 0 (RP/LC 0 ): Route Processor
Route Memory: MEM-GRP-512=
SLOT 2 (RP/LC 2 ): 4 port ATM Over SONET OC12c/STM-4c Multi Mode
Processor Memory: MEM-GRP/LC-256=
Packet Memory: MEM-LC1-PKT-256=
L3 Engine: 2 - Backbone OC48 (2.5 Gbps)
SLOT 5 (RP/LC 5 ): 3 Port Gigabit Ethernet
Processor Memory: MEM-GRP/LC-256=
Packet Memory: MEM-LC1-PKT-256=
L3 Engine: 2 - Backbone OC48 (2.5 Gbps)
For the life of us, we can't seem to get any more than 60Mbps
sustained across the ATM testing with iperf, so we're just trying to
figure out if the GSR just can't push any more than what it's doing or
if there's something else afoot.
CPU doesn't seem to be running too hot:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 6%/0%; one minute: 20%; five
minutes: 19%
Interface utilization seems reasonable.
bdr1.nyc-hudson-12008#show int a2/0 load
Interface bits/sec pack/sec
-------------------- ------------ ----------
AT2/0 Tx 48464000 14099
Rx 104808000 18012
bdr1.nyc-hudson-12008#show int a2/1 load
Interface bits/sec pack/sec
-------------------- ------------ ----------
AT2/1 Tx 57581000 13032
Rx 116319000 14466
bdr1.nyc-hudson-12008#show int g5/0 load
Interface bits/sec pack/sec
-------------------- ------------ ----------
Gi5/0 Tx 56851000 8981
Rx 35082000 7833
bdr1.nyc-hudson-12008#show int g5/1 load
Interface bits/sec pack/sec
-------------------- ------------ ----------
Gi5/1 Tx 166072000 23424
Rx 70951000 19116
bdr1.nyc-hudson-12008#
Total Throughput: 656128000
Total PPS: 118963
Average Size (B): 689.4
We've done our due diligence to ensure the bits of the network between
the test machine and the ATM can support 100Mbps, so we're fairly
confident that our test setup is adequate. We can get ~97Mbps across
other portions of the network (riding GE and 10GE on completely
different devices).
Are we pushing this thing to it's limits taking into consideration the
packet size vs. total throughput and total pps?
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list