[c-nsp] 3750 High Cpu IP Input
Chris Lane
clane1875 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 05:52:57 EDT 2009
sh proc cpu | exclude 0.00
CPU utilization for five seconds: 88%/63%; one minute: 89%; five minutes:
89%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
4 6029 389 15498 1.11% 0.16% 0.12% 0 Check heaps
9 2883 5699 505 0.15% 0.06% 0.07% 0 ARP Input
* 51 40119 129588 309 0.63% 1.22% 1.27% 0 Fifo Error
Detec*
67 2973 78578 37 0.15% 0.10% 0.08% 0 HLFM address
ret
81 16566 41729 396 0.79% 0.43% 0.43% 0 hpm main
process
*115 190582 60871 3130 6.86% 6.03% 6.01% 0 Hulc LED
Process*
123 5054 576 8774 0.31% 0.19% 0.16% 0 HQM Stack
Proces
136 25648 2746 9340 1.27% 0.77% 0.74% 0 PI MATM Aging
Pr
1*68 308273 1603815 192 9.10% 9.49% 9.82% 0 IP Input *
*
*
*Cisco doc reads the HULC LED is a possible link flapping yet nothing in
logs indicate.*
*
*
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Chris Lane <clane1875 at gmail.com> wrote:
> sh ip cef switching statistics feature
> IPv4 CEF input features:
> Feature Drop Consume Punt Punt2Host Gave
> route
> Total 0 0 0 0
> 0
>
> IPv4 CEF output features:
> Feature Drop Consume Punt Punt2Host New
> i/f
> Total 0 0 0 0
> 0
>
> IPv4 CEF post-encap features:
> Feature Drop Consume Punt Punt2Host New
> i/f
> Total 0 0 0 0
> 0
>
> IPv4 CEF for us features:
> Feature Drop Consume Punt Punt2Host New
> i/f
> Total 0 0 0 0
> 0
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 19:09 -0400, Chris Lane wrote:
>> > sh platform tcam utilization
>> >
>> > CAM Utilization for ASIC# 0 Max Used
>> ...
>>
>> Hm... nothing there (unless the other ASICs show dissimilar results). If
>> the problem is punted traffic, maybe "show ip cef switching statistics
>> feature" can tell you what it is.
>>
>> It could also be traffic directed at the switch itself of course.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> //CL
>
--
//CL
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list