[c-nsp] ISP in US

[Scott Granados]

I still like the heavy business jet solution.

:)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy William" <awilliam1981 at gmail.com>
To: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <daryl at introspect.net>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISP in US


> Daryl , so you recommed to get over-provisioned internet link and that 
> will
> do the job without extra effor ?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Daryl G. Jurbala 
> <daryl at introspect.net>wrote:
>
>>
>>  On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Andy William wrote:
>>
>>  Thx all and i will think about Gulfstream Daryl :)
>>
>> but i start to think about P2P connections like AT&T IPL (International
>> Private Line) or ATM PVC between both sites , what do you think ? what is
>> the estimated cost for 2M connection ?
>>
>>
>>
>> That is also a very expensive way to go (if not just as expensive), and a
>> lot of it depends on where your office is in the Middle East (to 
>> determine
>> which carrier you will need to pay AT&T to buy their last few miles of
>> transit through).
>>
>> I'm still not convinced that you need it - a 5 MB connection at each end
>> with a VPN between the two and some sane QoS at each edge device ought to 
>> be
>> more than enough.  I deliver thousands of simultaneous calls from the 
>> Middle
>> East through 3 GB connections to 3 different ISPs at my colo in San
>> Francisco.  No special agreements with anyone, the other sides of the 
>> calls
>> originating from internet connections owned by our customers.  No real
>> problems.
>>
>> So before signing any contracts, I would simply give it a shot right over
>> the Internet.  You'll likely be pleased with the results.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 4296 (20090801) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>