[c-nsp] IP unnumbered vlan subinterfaces question
Brian Turnbow
b.turnbow at twt.it
Mon Aug 3 12:18:38 EDT 2009
Not sure what's attached to the IP, or what you want to achieve , but a different approach would be to add no keepalive to the ethernet so it is always up.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Ulitskiy
Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 17.10
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IP unnumbered vlan subinterfaces question
Hello,
Guys, are there any drawbacks of doing the following:
interface Lo0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 1 native
ip unnumbered Lo0
!
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0.1
!
as opposed to having ip address configured directly on the interface as usual?
I need that ip address to stay always up regardless of Fa0/0 state, 'cause it's used for other services that should stay up
and I'd prefer to avoid assigning another ip address exclusively for loopback use.
It seems to work in my lab, but I thought I'd better ask...
Thanks,
Michael
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list