[c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?
Frank Bulk - iName.com
frnkblk at iname.com
Wed Aug 5 11:06:33 EDT 2009
Our DSLAM vendor supports PPPoA to PPPoE encapsulation/conversion (I'm not
sure how), so that's our migration plan if we need to move to a new BRAS
that doesn't have OC-3 interfaces.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of E. Versaevel
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 3:02 AM
To: Gert Doering
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?
Only drawback on the ASR1k platform is the lack of PPPoA support, otherwise
we would
have happely migrated away from our 7200/1G's
We got 2 ASR1004's for ethernet aggregation and they're doing just fine for
that :)
>
> If you *insist* on having route-processor redundancy (what about interface
> and physical path redundancy?), I think you can do that with ASR1k, but
> I admit to not having any hands-on experience with that platform yet.
>
Erik Versaevel
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list