[c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

[harbor235]

I would not use VLAN for disabled ports either, create a PARK vlan and
reassign all
unused diabled ports to the PARK vlan. That wy vlan 1 has no chance to be
mistakenly
activated.

mike

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:

> shadow floating wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I just have a question, as we know that Cisco preserve VLAN 1 for
> > management issues and network management needed protocols like CDP,
> > VTP  and the like, and all access from other VLANs to this VLAN should
> > be restricted except from the management VLAN, as for our network, we
> > are implementing a new management VLAN on a VLAN id other than 1
> > according to some consultant's advice, my question is : is there any
> > benefit of migrating the management (all managing and managed devices)
> > to another VLAN other than VLAN1 ??...won't in this case we have to
> > protect two VLANs (VLAN 1 and the new management VLAN)?...or is there
> > a real benefit in the migration of the management VLAN, as for my
> > knowledge...VLAN 1 can not be disabled or even pruned on trunk links?
> >
> > appreciating your comments
> > thanks alot
> >
>
> I don't use VLAN 1 at all anywhere. Except for the disabled ports.
>
> ~Seth
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>