[c-nsp] 6500 QoS
Randy McAnally
rsm at fast-serv.com
Fri Aug 21 17:27:34 EDT 2009
We got minor packet loss and noticeably slower speeds off the bat with 'mls
qos' enabled with all defaults, even with only 40-50% interface utilization.
In fact it took a while to figure it out. Be very careful when you enable it
if even minor packet loss will be an issue.
--
Randy
www.FastServ.com
---------- Original Message -----------
From: ML <ml at kenweb.org>
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:19:24 -0400
Subject: [c-nsp] 6500 QoS
> I'm about to turn on "mls qos" for the first time on a 6509E.
>
> I would like some background information from the QoS experts on
> this list.
>
> Last time I turned on "mls qos" it was a 3560 which has certain
> undesirable defaults when "mls qos" is turned on. I want avoid the
> same result with the 6509 which is our Internet edge device. What I
> want to accomplish is to mark all incoming traffic from our transit
> link to CS0.
>
> I don't want to inadvertently get clobbered by a default limit of x%
> for egress queue bandwidth that I'm not expecting.
>
> If I understand what I've found out so far:
>
> On the WS-X6724-SFP:
>
> Seems all possible CoS values are mapped to queue 1 for ingress and
> egress. The WRR queue ratios are 100,0,0 for queues 1,2,3 (4 is
> priority?) So Queue can utilize 100% of the interface bandwidth. So
> by default I shouldn't seem traffic getting bottlenecked where it
> wasn't before because of some default config?
>
> Is the simplest configuration to turn on mls qos globally and use a
> service policy to set all input to dscp cs0?
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------- End of Original Message -------
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list