[c-nsp] Does the entire BGP routing table for IPv6 fit on a Cisco 2600 with 64 MB of DRAM?

[Frank Bulk - iName.com]

The tunnel is up against HE's TunnelBroker service.  The Cisco 2600 is
reporting just 612 KB in use.

Frank

C2600#sh bgp  summary
BGP router identifier a.b.c.d, local AS number 53347
BGP table version is 2299, main routing table version 2299
2269 network entries using 301777 bytes of memory
2269 path entries using 163368 bytes of memory
1749 BGP path attribute entries using 104940 bytes of memory
1706 BGP AS-PATH entries using 41812 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
BGP using 611897 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 2271/2 prefixes, 2272/3 paths, scan interval 60 secs

Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
2001:470:1F03:10C::1
                4  6939    1923      26     2299    0    0 00:22:06     2269
C2600#

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk -
iName.com
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 2:58 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Does the entire BGP routing table for IPv6 fit on a Cisco
2600 with 64 MB of DRAM?

Does the entire BGP routing table for IPv6 (almost 2500 entries) fit on a
Cisco 2600 with 64 MB of DRAM running 12.3(26)?  I am planning to use this
box for an IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling appliance, but not sure if it can hold the
whole table.

Regards,

Frank


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/