[c-nsp] 8 Racks of Servers and Growing; switch/layout recommendations
Dobbins, Roland
rdobbins at arbor.net
Thu Dec 24 00:59:34 EST 2009
On Dec 24, 2009, at 12:48 AM, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
> Cabling costs (tends to favor tor)
Concur.
> Virtualization (layer-2 requirements, tends to favor eor)
Disagree - how do you think EoR is better in this regard?
> bisection bandwidth (tends to favor eor)
Disagree again.
> Racks (tends to favor tor since 1U is "free")
Concur.
> Redundancy (arguments on both sides, power, supervisor, links...)
Concur.
> 10Gb/sec server plans (and how that effects the other issues)
Not an issue, given N5K and blade switches, IMHO.
> Flexibility (tends to favor eor - any service at any port)
Strongly disagree - service switches are the answer for this.
> Unified fabric plans (currently in the Nexus line)
Again, if you go N5K/N7K, this isn't an issue either way.
> Cost (will depend on the eor/tor switch chosen, of course)
Concur.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
-- H.L. Mencken
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list