[c-nsp] DS1 provisioning using IP Unnumbered vs /30s

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Feb 7 01:14:41 EST 2009


On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:02:04PM -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >(If you do this, ICMPs sourced by the remote router will send their
> >packets with an RFC1918 source address, which is strictly not allowed.
> >If you filter those packets, you'll break traceroute and PMTUd).
> I find that to be OK.  :)

Breaking PMTUd is OK?  Thanks very much.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090207/2d74b55d/attachment.bin>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list