[c-nsp] BGP MSS=576 bytes

[Jose Conceicao]

After choosing whatever prefered method, wouldn't these BGP sessions need to
be re-established to take effect? (since MSS is only carried in SYN and
SYN/ACKs)
And shouldn't u account for TCP/IP overhead?
(just being lazy by not testing this in lab)

/Jose

2009/2/11 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>

> On 2009-02-11 20:24, Justin Shore wrote:
>
> So how do one force iBGP sessions to choose a larger datagram size? Do
>> you have to do it in the BGP config with 'neighbor a.b.c.d transport
>> path-mtu-discovery' or is there a more automatic solution?
>>
>
> 'ip tcp path-mtu-discovery' global command or the one You mentioned
> for per-neighbor tuning.
>
> --
> "Don't expect me to cry for all the     |               Łukasz Bromirski
>  reasons you had to die" -- Kurt Cobain |    http://lukasz.bromirski.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>