[c-nsp] Logical Router Segmentation

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:19:54AM -0700, Brandon Bennett wrote:
> In all honesty it's a stupid term as VRF technology isn't tied to MPLS  
> at all.   Yes vrf is required for l3 vpns but so is mBGP and we don't  
> have mBGP-lite :)

Well, mBGP is not strictly required... you can do L3 VPNs just fine with
any other routing protocol (which is VRF aware), but it might be less
convenient - and is certainly scaling less well.

(You'd need dedicated per-VRF links between your PE routers, of course)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090111/dbb3a1e9/attachment.bin>