[c-nsp] Per packet load balancing with low latency applications

[Peter Rathlev]

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 12:25 +0000, William wrote:
> Per packet is going to be used because there will only be one machine
> on each end of the link talking to each other.

As an alternative to MLPPP: Even though only two hosts communicate a per
session CEF load sharing would work (somewhat) as long as they have
several sessions open. Or should one session (TCP) be able to use all of
the bandwidth? In that case MLPPP is the way to go.

Regards,
Peter