[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 74, Issue 67

[Tassos Chatzithomaoglou]

This is not always the case (especially when both routers and switches are involved).

I have seen many times this A|B|C etherchannels created without any obvious reason.
And if you shut/no shut the member interfaces, the normal etherchannel is created fine.

--
Tassos

Engelhard Labiro wrote on 22/01/2009 03:48:
> This happen when you have a mismatch configuration between your
> "Port-channel interface" setting and Gigabit interfaces which are
> members of that Port-channel.
> 
> Compare again the settings in Port-channel and its members. All must
> be the same otherwise you will get several port-channels w/ alphabet
> assigned  :D
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Thilak T <thilak.t at gmail.com> wrote:
>> can anyone please advice what does it mean and why  is an LACP port-channel
>> displays an alphabet along with an actual channel number ?
>>
>> 240    Po240(SD)       LACP
>> 240    Po240A(SU)      LACP      Gi10/17(P) Gi10/18(P) Gi10/19(P) Gi10/20(P)
>> 240    Po240C(SU)      LACP      Gi10/21(P)
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>