[c-nsp] Cisco Local Area Mobility - (LAM)
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
achatz at forthnet.gr
Fri Jul 3 06:32:07 EDT 2009
Do you have the global "router mobile" configured?
--
Tassos
Bogdan Radulescu wrote on 03/07/2009 12:08:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to use LAM on the following topology without much luck...
>
> V100left---|3560G|---p-t-pL3link--|6500|---l2link--|7600|--V100right
>
> V100left = SVI = 172.16.224.0/19
> V100right = SVI = 192.168.224.0/19
> V100right just random subnet, no clients
> 7600#interface Vlan100
> ip address 192.168.224.1 255.255.0.0
> ip mobile arp timers 1 1
> end
>
> Between 6500 and 7600 i have a dynamic routing protocol and 6500
> announces V100left into BGP.
> 6500 has a static route for V100left to 3560G.
> Connected to 7600 there is a server on V150 that needs to "talk" with
> these "clients"
> Clients don't need to talk to each other.
>
> I would like to move clients from V100 left to V100 right. I don't want
> to change ip addresses.
> V100left will be moved when all clients move to the right.
>
> It looks like 7600 detects the foreign ip on it's interface V100right,
> but doesn't put a "mobile" route for it.
> All i can see is this:
> --------------------------------
> Local MobileIP: aging arp mobility cache entries
> Local MobileIP: aging arp entry 172.16.225.153 60028 60000 60000
> Local MobileIP: Vlan100 add 172.16.225.153 accepted
> Local MobileIP: Vlan100 add 172.16.225.153 accepted
> Local MobileIP: Vlan100 add 172.16.225.153 accepted
> ----------------------------------
> 7600#sh arp vlan 100 detail
> ARP entry for 172.16.225.153, link type IP.
> Simple Application, via Vlan100, last updated 0 minute ago.
> Created by "IP Mobility".
> Encap type is ARPA, hardware address is 0006.1901.2925, 6 bytes long.
> ARP subblocks:
> * Application Simple ARP Subblock
> Entry is complete.
> * IP ARP Adjacency
> Adjacency (for 172.16.225.153 on Vlan100) was installed.
> * IP Mobility
> ARP Application entry for application IP Mobility.
> * IP ARP VLAN ID
> Subblock data size is 4 bytes.
> VLAN IN ID: 100
> VLAN OUT ID: 100
> ------------------------------------------
> 7600#sh ip route | i 172.16.225.153
> *? 172.16.225.153/32 [0/1] via 172.16.225.153*
> ------------------------------------------
> sh ip route 172.16.225.153
> Routing entry for 172.16.225.153/32
> Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 1
> Last update from 172.16.225.153 00:41:57 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 172.16.225.153
> Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1
> ------------------------------------------
>
> debug ip packet detail gives me this
>
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBipv4-packet-proc: route packet from (local) src
> 172.16.0.1 dst 172.16.225.153
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: Default:172.16.225.153/32 proces level
> forwarding
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: depth 0 first_idx 0 paths 1 long 0(0)
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: try path 0 (of 1) v4-rcrsv-172.16.225.153
> first short ext 0(-1)
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: v4-rcrsv-172.16.225.153 valid
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: ip_pak_table 0 ip_nh_table 0 if none nh
> 172.16.225.153 deag 0 via fib 0 path type recursive
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBfwd-proc: Default:172.16.225.153/32 not enough info
> to forward via fib (none 172.16.225.153)
> Jul 2 23:32:19: FIBipv4-packet-proc: packet routing failed
> Jul 2 23:32:19: IP: s=172.16.0.1 (local), d=172.16.225.153, len 100,
> unroutable
> Jul 2 23:32:19: ICMP type=8, code=0
>
> On the same 7600 i have several other VLANs with subnets from
> 172.16.0.0/16 and some
> L3 interfaces part of other VRFs
>
>
> Is what i want possible or i\m wasting my time and yours? :)
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list