[c-nsp] Maximum spannig tree instances
Peter Rathlev
peter at rathlev.dk
Mon Jul 13 18:32:20 EDT 2009
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:38 +0200, Nicolas Rolans wrote:
> This supportwiki article [snip] could be what you're looking for. I
> confirm the 1800 instances/slot limit.
... but it doesn't say anything about the number of STP instances.
I tested it on a Sup720 SXI1 and could create more than 1800 STP
instances with the VLANs split among two modules:
r2(config)#do sh vlan vir
Slot 4
-------
Total slot virtual ports 1799
Slot 5
-------
Total slot virtual ports 1799
Total chassis virtual ports 3598
r2(config)#do sh spann summ tot
Switch is in rapid-pvst mode
Root bridge for: VLAN0100-VLAN0110, VLAN0115-VLAN0118, VLAN0120-VLAN0131
VLAN0133-VLAN0297, VLAN0500-VLAN0999, VLAN1021-VLAN2281, VLAN2300-VLAN2337
VLAN2400-VLAN4000
EtherChannel misconfig guard is enabled
Extended system ID is enabled
Portfast Default is disabled
Portfast Edge BPDU Guard Default is disabled
Portfast Edge BPDU Filter Default is disabled
Loopguard Default is enabled
PVST Simulation Default is enabled but inactive in rapid-pvst mode
Bridge Assurance is enabled
UplinkFast is disabled
BackboneFast is disabled
Pathcost method used is long
Name Blocking Listening Learning Forwarding STP Active
---------------------- -------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------
3598 vlans 0 0 0 3598 3598
r2(config)#
I got this message during the configuration:
%SW_VLAN-SP-4-VTP_SEM_BUSY: VTP semaphore is unavailable for function sw_vlansp_get_4k_vlan_info. Semaphore locked by download info
After deleting the VLANs and trying the same again the message did not
appear, so I guess it's nothing really bad.
It seems that more then 1800 instances are possible. I didn't have more
than a two module (Sup720-10G + 6724-SFP) configuration to test this on
at hand.
My bold guess would be that the system limit for number of STP instances
is 10000/13000 total virtual ports (RPVST/PVST).
Whether having 1800+ STP instances on the same switch is a good idea i
something completely different. :-)
Regards,
Peter
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list