[c-nsp] Maximum spannig tree instances
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Tue Jul 14 11:43:24 EDT 2009
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Pendery wrote:
> "I've wondered about that...if we were to move to MST, we're going to
> have to assign every VLAN to an MST instance, which could get messy."
>
> That's exactly why I was warning about the 16/64 instance limit. This
> was my mindset when moving from PVST to MST, and I suspect there are
> many others out there thinking this way. But if you have more than 64
> VLANs, you can't do that. You'll have to look at their topology and
That's not what I meant. I just meant we'd have to decide which instance
(of likely just a few of them) to assign every VLAN to...as every VLAN has
to be assigned to some instance. I should setup a lab of switches again
and play around with MST. IIRC, the docs I've read about MST on cisco.com
generally split up the VLANs between MST instances 2 and 3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list