[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 49
Digambar. Giri
digambar.giri at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 03:24:00 EDT 2009
DEar frend
i need a crak....... IPswitch Whatsup gold 11
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L <MatlockK at exempla.org>wrote:
> The serial numbers can be found here:
>
> http://www.whatsupgold.com/
>
>
> Ken Matlock
> Network Analyst
> Exempla Healthcare
> (303) 467-4671
> matlockk at exempla.org
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Digambar. Giri
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 8:29 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 49
>
> Dear friends
> please provide IPswitch Whatsup gold 11 serial key NMs...
>
>
> On 7/14/09, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net <
> cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> >
> > Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
> > cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> >
> > You can rDAr each the person managing the list at
> > cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: "Software Download Area is Unavailable at this time"
> > (Gert Doering)
> > 2. Block URL ACCESS LIST (Mohammad Khalil)
> > 3. Re: multiple vlans on a port (Gert Doering)
> > 4. Re: Block URL ACCESS LIST (masood at nexlinx.net.pk)
> > 5. Re: IPv6 iBGP Route Reflector (Steve Bertrand)
> > 6. Re: ASA IPsec Tunnel Failover (Forrest, Michael E.)
> > 7. Re: ASA IPsec Tunnel Failover (A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk)
> > 8. Re: Maximum spannig tree instances (Geoffrey Pendery)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:56:48 +0200
> > From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> > To: Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>
> > Cc: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
> > <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>, Jared Mauch
> <jared at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] "Software Download Area is Unavailable at this
> > time"
> > Message-ID: <20090714085648.GD290 at greenie.muc.de>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:16:23AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> > > But can I just make a recommendation to everyone here: next time you
> go
> > > out to competitive tender, specify the nature of docs & software
> > > availability. List "HTTP downloads without client software or
> plugins"
> > > as a mandatory requirement.
> >
> > While this is a nice idea to cause some pressure, I can't see it as
> > overly realistic - if I have a router A that will fulfill everything
> > that we need, and a router B that will only do 80% and at the same
> > time costs 20% more, but has a better company web interface, I think
> it's
> > very unlikely that their web download thingie will be change our
> > decision.
> >
> > (Besides, most competitors web sites and software download processes
> are
> > even worse)
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> > //
> > www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: not available
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 304 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > URL: <
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090714/13933a9
> 4/attachment-0001.bin
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:48:52 +0300
> > From: Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
> > To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Block URL ACCESS LIST
> > Message-ID: <BLU102-W20D319D228A429D7F5B1F9FA230 at phx.gbl>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
> >
> >
> > how can i block url using access-list ?
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Drag n? drop?Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live? Photos.
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:49:11 +0200
> > From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> > To: Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com>
> > Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] multiple vlans on a port
> > Message-ID: <20090714094911.GH290 at greenie.muc.de>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:38:23PM -0400, Matthew Huff wrote:
> > > Also, with 802.1q framing, you might run into fragmentation on
> > > the non-native VLANs. You may want to adjust the MTU on the virtual
> > > machines if Linux doesn't do it automatically.
> >
> > There are a few broken NIC cards on the Linux side that have issues
> > with "baby-jumbo" packets (1500 + 4 byte for 802.1q header). Decent
> > gear - and that's what you want to use on a *server* - doesn't have
> > any issues there.
> >
> > And, just to clarify: *If* you have MTU problems due to 802.1q
> headers,
> > you will not see "fragmentation". You'll see black-holing, because
> the
> > stack will not know about the MTU issue, and thus won't even think
> > about fragmentation. (Fragmentation happens if there is a link on
> > the path that has smaller L3 MTU than the packet's sender - but in
> this
> > scenario, the L3 endpoints assume 1500, while the L2 link cannot
> handle
> > this. Black hole).
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> > //
> > www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: not available
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 304 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > URL: <
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090714/6dc4550
> 8/attachment-0001.bin
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:13:52 +0500 (PKT)
> > From: masood at nexlinx.net.pk
> > To: "Mohammad Khalil" <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Block URL ACCESS LIST
> > Message-ID:
> >
> <24754.196.46.241.57.1247570032.squirrel at nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> >
> >
> > Please go to the following URL to begin:
> >
> >
> >
> http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/archive/2008/11/15/how-nbar-actually-classif
> ies-the-traffic-flows.aspx
> >
> > Regards,
> > Masood
> >
> > >
> > > how can i block url using access-list ?
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Drag n? drop?Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live? Photos.
> > >
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:23:09 -0400
> > From: Steve Bertrand <steve at ibctech.ca>
> > To: Aleksandr Gurbo <kron at linkey.ru>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 iBGP Route Reflector
> > Message-ID: <4A5C78AD.5050006 at ibctech.ca>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:08:17 -0400
> > > Steve Bertrand <steve at ibctech.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Over the weekend, I'll find out how the OP can fix the routes, and
> > >> moreover, why they are broken in the first place.
> > >>
> > >> Steve
> > >
> > > Have you any ideas how to fix reflected routes?
> >
> > I will be working on this specific issue today, as I need to make some
> > changes in preparation of adding a new router later this week.
> >
> > I'll keep you posted if I find anything specific as I go.
> >
> > Steve
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: smime.p7s
> > Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> > Size: 3233 bytes
> > Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> > URL: <
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090714/efe1560
> f/attachment-0001.bin
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:50:35 +0100
> > From: "Forrest, Michael E." <michael.forrest at abdn.ac.uk>
> > To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA IPsec Tunnel Failover
> > Message-ID:
> >
> <D2BEF91BFE51C743854D7AB86BA35A354984F7EC25 at VMAILA.uoa.abdn.ac.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > I was under the impression that there was no BGP support in the ASA
> > platform, unless someone knows otherwise?
> >
> > Michael.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > > bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Prabhu Gurumurthy
> > > Sent: 14 July 2009 00:34
> > > To: Munoz, Jeff
> > > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA IPsec Tunnel Failover
> > >
> > > Answer is: BGP
> > >
> > > On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Munoz, Jeff wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey guys, I have two main sites (site A and site B) and one remote
> > > > site (site C). Sites A and B have a metroethernet connection
> > > > between them. Remote site C has an IPsec tunnel back to site A.
> > > > I'd like to setup failover so in case site A's ASA is down the
> > > > remote site C ASA sends the interesting traffic down the site B
> > > > IPsec tunnel. Unfortunately, it will always match the tunnel to
> > > > site A since the phase 2 access lists have the same source/
> > > > destinations. Any ideas on how I can do this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> > The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No
> > SC013683.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:03:24 +0100
> > From: A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
> > To: "Forrest, Michael E." <michael.forrest at abdn.ac.uk>
> > Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA IPsec Tunnel Failover
> > Message-ID: <20090714130324.GA16535 at lboro.ac.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Hi,
> > > I was under the impression that there was no BGP support in the ASA
> > platform, unless someone knows otherwise?
> >
> > ah, ASAs and dynamic routing protocols...and you'll be wanting
> > those in multi-context mode too? ;-)
> >
> > alan
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:21:53 -0500
> > From: Geoffrey Pendery <geoff at pendery.net>
> > To: A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Maximum spannig tree instances
> > Message-ID:
> > <d6966e4b0907140621s504dea4aq120b1f2440f76f1d at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Yes, but he also mentions MST, which has a much more restrictive
> limit.
> > As far as I've seen, 802.1s itself only allows 64 instances (see
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanning_tree_protocol , or search for
> > the proper RFC docs)
> > But all the Cisco docs I've found this morning say they only support
> 16:
> > for example:
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/na
> tive/configuration/guide/spantree.html#wp1064097
> >
> > I could have sworn I found stuff saying that our gear would support 64
> > of them, and we've been contemplating more than 40 in recent designs,
> > but I guess I'll have to validate in the lab whether it's actually 16
> > or 64 for our chassis and code.
> >
> > So keep in mind that if you're moving from RPVST to MST, you're
> > talking about fewer instances, by necessity.
> >
> >
> > -Geoff
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:45 AM, <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> ... but it doesn't say anything about the number of STP instances.
> > >
> > > things go wonky when you have more than 1800 virtualports per slot
> > > (which you didnt quite reach) (1200 on older eg 100mbit blades)
> > > with 13,000 in total (PVST+), 10,000 in total (RPVST+)
> > >
> > > however, with MST, you can have 6000 virtual ports per blade and
> 50,000
> > > in total (yay!)
> > >
> > > however, this is all about logical interfaces. you want to know the
> > > STP instance?
> > >
> > > regarding maximum STP instances... I believe theres a platform limit
> > > of 1024 because of the MAC to VLAN bridge mapping on the platform -
> > > but, from the values above, you can see that virtual ports would
> > > hit you quite quickly without appropriate control of the VLANs
> > >
> > > alan
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list ?cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list
> > cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >
> > End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 49
> > *****************************************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Digambar Giri
> +91- 9975776368
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
--
Regards,
Digambar Giri
+91- 9975776368
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list