[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 (7609) as core BGP router.

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Jul 17 22:35:02 EDT 2009


On Saturday 18 July 2009 05:40:30 am Jim Wininger wrote:

> Does anyone have any recommendations on the 7600's as a
> core BGP router? Good or bad? Have they been a stable
> platform in a core/BGP environment?

I believe it should work well as a core router, i.e., it has 
the grunt to haul lots of traffic around (assuming you're 
going for the RSP720 supervisor engine), minimal feature 
configuration as most core routers would have, e.t.c.

The only trick with this platform as a core router (well, in 
our case, at least) is that it's optimized for Ethernet, 
really. So unless all your links to your other PoP's (which 
generally terminate into your core) are Ethernet, it might 
start to get pretty expensive sticking SIP's/SPA's into this 
platform to support SONET/SDH and the like for your external 
PoP links, particularly if you're on the lower end of 
things, e.g., OC-3/STM-1, OC-12/STM-4, e.t.c.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090718/93b53bcb/attachment.bin>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list