[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 (7609) as core BGP router.
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Jul 17 22:35:02 EDT 2009
On Saturday 18 July 2009 05:40:30 am Jim Wininger wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations on the 7600's as a
> core BGP router? Good or bad? Have they been a stable
> platform in a core/BGP environment?
I believe it should work well as a core router, i.e., it has
the grunt to haul lots of traffic around (assuming you're
going for the RSP720 supervisor engine), minimal feature
configuration as most core routers would have, e.t.c.
The only trick with this platform as a core router (well, in
our case, at least) is that it's optimized for Ethernet,
really. So unless all your links to your other PoP's (which
generally terminate into your core) are Ethernet, it might
start to get pretty expensive sticking SIP's/SPA's into this
platform to support SONET/SDH and the like for your external
PoP links, particularly if you're on the lower end of
things, e.g., OC-3/STM-1, OC-12/STM-4, e.t.c.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090718/93b53bcb/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list