[c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA

[Binh Phan]

The original user was asking for assistance on what would be the right  
configuration specific to his scenario which was a host static NAT and  
Ryan simply provided that.
I simply saw what you stated was not adding any value to the  
discussion other than what seemed to be fault finding, as adding  
netmask in this case, OR NOT makes absolutely no difference. Maybe I  
read it wrong and if so I apologize.
Agree, best practices are important but it's irrelevant in this  
context or discussion, IMO.
--Binh
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:

> You pointed out, to me, on how to complete a command.  I don't need  
> assistance with that.
>
> I pointed out that it is best to offer people that are newer to  
> Cisco and/or a specific platform best practices (for many reasons).
>
> Here's an example from my home ASA on why best practices...are best  
> practices:
>
> homepix(config)# static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100
> homepix(config)# sh run static
> static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100 netmask  
> 255.255.255.255
> homepix(config)# static (inside,outside) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0
> homepix(config)# sh run static
> static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100 netmask  
> 255.255.255.255
> static (inside,outside) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0
>
> If you think that's arrogance, that's your opinion.
>
> tv
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Binh Phan" <binh.l.phan at gmail.com>
> To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale at comcast.net>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA
>
>
>> Wow! Arrogance at its best ;-)
>> Sure been around Cisco long enough and infact been _IN_ Cisco long  
>> enough..
>> but I simply wanted to point out the fact that it was uneccessary  
>> what you pointed out. No offense!!
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
>>
>>> If you haven't been around Cisco long enough to know not to  
>>> assume,  then be my guest.
>>>
>>> But, that's poor advice to offer a person that is somewhat new  
>>> (or  new) to Cisco.  That's how bad habits start.
>>>
>>> tv
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Binh Phan" <binh.l.phan at gmail.com 
>>> >
>>> To: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale at comcast.net>
>>> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:10 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would recommend completing your static with the appropriate   
>>>>> netmask.
>>>> >>You do not need to specify netmask in this case since it's a /32
>>>> and will be auto-completed when you enter the command in CLI.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/