[c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday 30 July 2009 03:06:10 am Kevin Loch wrote:

> Lots of folks, myself included use /112 for point to
> point links, server only subnets and just about anything
> that doesn't require RA's (which is almost everything in
> a hosting environment).  /112 is a convenient bit
> boundary to work with and one size fits all (p-p and
> multipoint) applications.

We've been happy using /126's for point-to-point links (core 
and customer connections), and /112's for LAN's.

> Making it difficult for autoconf to work on certain
> subnets is a big plus.

Couldn't agree more :-).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090730/6fa49c06/attachment.bin>