[c-nsp] L2TPv3 performance over gig?

[Aaron]

What does that have to do with L2TPv3?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:09, Ge Moua <moua0100 at umn.edu> wrote:

> I've done testing for both:
> * no encryption: ~ 980Mb
> * encryption ~ 240 Mb
>
> Performance dependent on router platform (in my case 7203 w/ NSE-100)
>
> Encryption was on 7206 w/ NPE-G1 & VAM2+
>
> Conclusion, performance limited to hardware used and not layer-1 link
> speed.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Ge Moua | Email: moua0100 at umn.edu
>
> Network Design Engineer
> University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services
>
>
>
>
> Chris Fournier wrote:
>
>> Does anyone use L2TPv3 over a gig link, and what is the performance
>> overhead introduced? I've seen some numbers at the Cisco website, but
>> these seem to reference encryption versus encapsulation.
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>