[c-nsp] Global Route Leaking on same PE

[Luan Nguyen]

You could also use a GRE tunnel for the connection as well.
Jeff is right that this topic keeps coming up every so often.  I wonder why
Cisco won't just make this easier for people.

----------------------------------------------
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
http://www.netcraftsmen.net
----------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ivan Pepelnjak
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:24 PM
To: 'Clue Store'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Global Route Leaking on same PE

The last time I've seen discussion on this topic, you had to have an
external back-to-back connection between a VRF interface and a global
interface. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clue Store [mailto:cluestore at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:18 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Global Route Leaking on same PE
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Looked through the archives but couldn't find anything about 
> this specific issue. I'm trying to leak a route from the 
> global table on a PE to an iterface that is on the same PE 
> but I get the folowwing when I try to just point it to a loopback.....
> 
> ip route vrf test 64.193.x.x 255.255.255.248 192.168.222.1 
> global %Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
> 
> Also tried to point it to just the interface and it says vpn 
> routes have to be pointed to next-hop addresses. Anyone have 
> some clue how to get this to work where the traffic never 
> leaves the same PE and makes a look around the network??
> 
> TIA
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/