[c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?

[Paul Stewart]

Hey there...

Between the two 7206's in question, we have about 280 BGP peers configured
split about 60/40 between them.... ;)

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Ernst [mailto:rick at woofpaws.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 12:32 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?


Thanks to everyone for the feedback so far.

For my situation, the two biggest items that stand out are:
 - 4GB vs 1GB RAM
 - 7600 chassis only, not 6500 (planning on a 7600 chassis, though)

I'm a bit surprised that you are seeing ~60%  memory used by BGP. My
border routers (4 routers, 1 full feed each) and core (route-reflectors)
are both only showing about 25% memory used, total.

Since the Sup720 (spec-wise, at least) capacity is roughly 2 orders of
magnitude higher than I'm currently pushing through the core, it looks
like it should serve for several years.  The RSP720 becomes an upgrade
option if 1GB is no longer big enough for full tables (plus IPv6
roll-out?).

On the subject of memory and DFCs... do the DFCs also support 4GB for the
FIB, or is this an apples vs oranges comparison?

Thanks,


On Fri, June 19, 2009 08:31, Paul Stewart wrote:
> I'm not sure about performance numbers but biggest thing I can see is
> support for 4GB RAM - for us, this is becoming an issue with BGP tables
> chewing up 60% of our memory today in 3BXL's.  I miss the PRP2 platform
> for
> BGP now... thinking of moving back to GSR's in the near future on PRP3's
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rick Ernst
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:55 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?
>
>
> I'm not seeing anything jump out at me as different between the
> Sup720(3BXL) and RSP.  What am I missing?
>
> The potential deployment is core "glue" (router-reflector, redundancy)
> between border and aggregation layers.  Other than BGP and OSPF, it's job
> would be essentially to just move packets. uRPF and BGP blackholing would
> be at the border, but I'd like to pull NetFlow data from the core.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>