[c-nsp] BGP Load balance for the uplink

[Roger Wiklund]

How about just using
maximum-path x, and then do some route maps forcing only
some traffic to only use the faster link unless its down. Then you can
loadbalance on evetyhing else but the specific traffic. Then you might
get a more even utilization of the links.

Or perhaps if you can try the disable-connected-check, but it probably wont
work with dmzlink-bw

Regards
Roger

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Roger Wiklund <roger.wiklund at gmail.com>wrote:

> How about just using
> maximum-path x, and then do some route maps forcing only
> some traffic to only use the faster link unless its down. Then you can
> loadbalance on evetyhing else but the specific traffic. Then you might
> get a more even utilization of the links.
>
> Or perhaps if you can try the disable-connected-check, but it probably wont
> work with dmzlink-bw
>
> Regards
> Roger
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Georgi Genov <linuxloader at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Here is my scenario , i have 2 uplink providers , one with 2 backup
>> sessions on two different vlans with 2x /30 ip addr and other with multihop
>> bgp .First provider with the 2 sessions i have 2:1 speed compare against the
>> second . I advertise at the both providers same prefix lists . ( 2x /18 and
>> one /24 ) . dmzlink-bw is one solution , but it didn`t work at multihop bgp
>> . Some other suggestions .
>>
>> PS: Ruter is RSP720-3CXL-GE with Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp
>> Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB5a, RELEASE
>> SOFTWARE (fc1)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>