[c-nsp] VRF-AWARE MBGP

[Josh Fleishman]

Indeed it is.  I'm exchanging vrf routes with a router in another AS, and I
want to enable RPF checks via a different path than the EBGP learned unicast
path.  The only other option I see is using static mroutes in the upstream
router.  Not exactly ideal.

-Josh



On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>wrote:

> Gergely Antal wrote:
>
>> you need address-family ipv4 mdt
>> and a separate vrf to carry the traffic
>>
>
> I don't think that's what the OP wants. I think he wants a different
> multicast RPF routing table for a VRF.
>
> I don't think you can do this (annoyingly)
>