[c-nsp] Supress STP on a port?

[Lincoln Dale]

its a matter of SHOULD you.  enabling eating BPDUs is never a wise thing 
IMHO.

not sure what you're looking for exactly - are you looking to have 
multiple VLANs on a port, but not have that port as a 'network' port?

if so, why not enable it as 'edge trunk' port?  best of both worlds & 
keep your STP protective measures in place (loop guard et al) ?



cheers,

lincoln.

Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> What about if it is a trunk port... which isn't portfasted.... and  you can
> only do that command on a portfast port yes?
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giovanni Torres [mailto:torresgi at ninds.nih.gov] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 11:35 PM
> To: skeeve at skeeve.org
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Supress STP on a port?
>
> Switch(config-if)# spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
>
> Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>   
>> Is it possible to suppress STP on a specific port?
>>
>> .Skeeve
>>
>> --
>> Skeeve Stevens, RHCE
>> skeeve at skeeve.org / www.skeeve.org
>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
>>
>> eintellego - skeeve at eintellego.net - www.eintellego.net
>> --
>> I'm a groove licked love child king of the verse
>> Si vis pacem, para bellum
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>