[c-nsp] Netflow on SUP720-3BXL
Andy BIERLAIR
andy.bierlair at root.lu
Sun Mar 15 10:45:30 EDT 2009
I'm trying to run netflow on one of our Cisco core routers (SUP720-3BXL with
SXF15a), but I think I am hitting some limitations because of this:
%EARL_NETFLOW-SP-4-TCAM_THRLD: Netflow TCAM threshold exceeded, TCAM
Utilization [99%]
The setup of netflow looks like this (globally):
ip flow-cache entries 524288
mls aging fast time 5 threshold 32
mls aging long 300
mls aging normal 60
mls netflow usage notify 80 300
mls flow ip full
no mls flow ipv6
mls nde sender version 5
no mls verify ip checksum
no mls acl tcam share-global
ip flow-export source Loopback0
ip flow-export version 5 origin-as
ip flow-export destination <ip> <port>
Then I have this enabled on all border interfaces/vlans (peering / transit /
other core routers) that are of interest for my stats:
ip route-cache flow
Some more details about the problem:
#sh mls netflow table-contention detailed
Earl in Module 5
Detailed Netflow CAM (TCAM and ICAM) Utilization
================================================
TCAM Utilization : 100%
ICAM Utilization : 13%
Netflow TCAM count : 262033
Netflow ICAM count : 17
Netflow Creation Failures : 4822220
Netflow CAM aliases : 1
#sh mls netflow table-contention aggregate
Earl in Module 5
Aggregate Netflow CAM Contention Information
=============================================
Netflow Creation Failures : 130003616
Netflow Hash Aliases : 4
#sh mls netflow flowmask
current ip flowmask for unicast: full
current ipv6 flowmask for unicast: null
I understand that the TCAM is full, but what can I do against it? This is a
busy core router:
Aggregated traffic: 7-8 GBIT/s
Packets per Second: 1.0 - 1.2 Million
I have heard that more agressive aging might help, but I expect the router's
traffic and pps to increase dramatically, so I'll be hitting the roof over
and over again.
I wouldn't mind analyzing only every 10th or 100th flow (sampling), which
seems to be a common practice, but will it help?
What is the common netflow setup without additional DFCs for a busy router?
Any good piece of advice is welcome.
Thanks!
-
Andy
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list