[c-nsp] Redundant switch fabric

[Tony Varriale]

In Ciscoland, that is redundant sups.

I would recommend asking for clarification and educating on how redundant 
sups and redundant boxes provide some different resiliency options.

tv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Louis" <MLouis at nwnit.com>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:05 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] Redundant switch fabric


>I have a solution design that requires redundant switch fabrics. I am 
>interpreting this beyond just have redundant supervisors meaning redundant 
>backplanes on the switch cards. Do the 6500 and 4500 support redundant 
>fabrics? Will a 6748 function with one trace failed?
> ________________________________
> Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of 
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
> information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, 
> confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If 
> you have received this communication in error, please notify the original 
> sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this 
> message along with any attachments immediately.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/