[c-nsp] Trouble in an ASA migration from CheckPoint

[SHAM SHARMA]

Agree .. Cisco still has long way to go match with Checkpoint

You will notice it as you will go with this transaction .... You will
endup in using more public IP's ... finding lot of bugs ... helping
Cisco not vice versa

Sorry but tht's utter truth ...

On 5/11/09, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Marcelo Zilio <ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rubens,
> >
> > Thanks for your response.
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you meant...
> >
> > Remember IPs 200.1.1.1 and 190.1.1.1 are Internet address and I cannot
> > control their DNS resolution.
>
> Yes we can! :-)
>
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/networking/news/views_0501.html
>
> In effect, you would answer based on the IP address of the DNS
> recursor and not the client itself, but if we are talking big /8s,
> that usually has a strong correlation.
>
>
> Rubens
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>