[c-nsp] High memory utilisation on ASR 1004
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
achatz at forthnet.gr
Wed May 13 17:33:44 EDT 2009
Dual IOSd processes in ASR1000 SW redundancy result in both the active and standby process
having access to about 750MB of RP memory (each); what is left is used by other RP
processes. Check "sh platform soft status contr" for more details about RP mem usage.
Regarding the SBC thing... i had the same problem...but i haven't got any answer yet.
PS: To be honest, i haven't found any real advantage of sw redundancy yet. I only met more
issues.
--
Tassos
Pshem Kowalczyk wrote on 13/05/2009 23:55:
> Hi,
>
> We use ASR 1004 for internet peering. I've noticed that despite the
> fact that the device should have 4G of RAM (2G for each IOS), it only
> reports about 750M:
>
>
> cisco ASR1004 (RP1) processor with 750908K/6147K bytes of memory.
> 10 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
> 1 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interface
> 32768K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
> 4194304K bytes of physical memory.
>
> Why is there such a huge difference?
>
> Other thing that I've noticed - after bringing first full feed the
> free memory dropped by almost 300M, after bringing two more peers
> we're down another 200M, even though the BGP summary doesn't reflect
> that:
>
> BGP router identifier 172.16.31.212, local AS number axaz
> BGP table version is 1499020, main routing table version 1499020
> 319336 network entries using 45345712 bytes of memory
> 1754099 path entries using 119278732 bytes of memory
> 521347/50531 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 39622372 bytes of memory
> 12 BGP rrinfo entries using 288 bytes of memory
> 105606 BGP AS-PATH entries using 2952666 bytes of memory
> 5844 BGP community entries using 579940 bytes of memory
> 18 BGP extended community entries using 608 bytes of memory
> 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
> 0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
> BGP using 207780318 total bytes of memory
> 853191 received paths for inbound soft reconfiguration
> BGP activity 451647/132207 prefixes, 2813379/1059265 paths, scan
> interval 15 secs
>
> And the last thing - there seem to be a lot of memory allocated to the
> SBC process:
> (sh processes memory sorted)
>
> Processor Pool Total: 768844520 Used: 666617736 Free: 102226784
> lsmpi_io Pool Total: 6295088 Used: 6294116 Free: 972
>
> PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process
> 247 0 524286824 156132532 372840416 0 0 BGP Router
> 0 0 157038032 10062300 127440824 0 0 *Init*
> 339 0 74528188 548 74698500 0 0 SBC main process
> 160 0 91102924 1746296 74647640 0 0 IP RIB Update
> 221 0 7073896 320908 7097036 0 0 BGP Scanner
> 90 0 4017044 39640 2498096 0 0 CWAN OIR Handler
> 52 0 2309192 2832 1977032 0 0 IOSD ipc task
> 1 0 540036 3104 554072 0 0 Chunk Manager
> 0 0 0 0 462436 0 0 *MallocLite*
> 27 0 802824 2464 436260 0 0 IPC Seat Control
> 0 0 1425513440 1426114596 375724 7275888 0 *Dead*
> 18 0 299268 0 321720 113400 0 EEM ED Syslog
>
> How can i claim that memory back?
>
> kind regards
> Pshem
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list