[c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?

[Tony Varriale]

Surely you mean 40mbps or a different platform?

tv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rens" <rens at autempspourmoi.be>
To: "'Adrian Chadd'" <adrian at creative.net.au>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:12 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?


>I have already done up to 400 Mbps with 2811 or 2821 (don't remember)
> You just have to make sure your MTU is high enough depending on the frame
> sizes you want to tunnel.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adrian Chadd
> Sent: jeudi 5 novembre 2009 7:22
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Experiences with l2tpv3/xconnect?
> 
> G'day,
> 
> I've been asked by a customer to solve an L2 ethernet problem
> and I'm investigating simply tunneling the required VLANs over
> L2TPv3/xconnect.
> 
> Does anyone have any rough throughput (PPS in particular) info
> they'd like to share ? And any other deployment info - actually,
> in particular I'd like to know about fragmentation related issues.
> 
> I'm looking at the Cisco 28xx series (potentially the Cisco 2811)
> but I'm concerned about hitting throughput ceilings.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/