[c-nsp] IS-IS Multiarea on 12.2 SR
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Tue Nov 10 09:31:40 EST 2009
On Monday 09 November 2009 03:23:46 pm Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> I'm not questioning your decision, I'm just stating it
> for the archives and for everyone else who has to make
> this same decision at some point in the future: If you
> have to ask, just don't do it. I see way too many people
> trying to deploy areas with 10 router networks because
> they read somewhere that it was what they were supposed
> to do to scale, or because people saw it on an exam
> somewhere.
This makes sense, and I appreciate where you're coming from.
<instructor hat>
However, wearing my "instructor" hat when we give workshops
in various places around the world, we tend to teach folk
how to build large scale networks, based on our own
experiences doing the same.
In some cases, we say build scaling into your operations
even when it may seem "unnecessary", because the general
assumption is that your network is going to grow. Sure, it
could take 5, 10, 15 years, depending on whom you ask, but
if there's a chance it does grow, you don't want to re-work
your entire design to add scaling into the mix; especially
since adding scalability in from the start doesn't add any
incremental cost in terms of $$ or complexity.
And I'm not just talking about OSPF or IS-IS specifically
(since router CPU's are much faster these days, assuming
operators can afford such platforms), but networking in
general, especially for some features or protocols where
thinking about scalability from day one isn't such a bad
idea, even if it might make little sense today.
I'm sure many of us, in our careers as network operators,
have wished that we had done something differently in the
past not to suffer the pain of today - even if it seemed
infeasible, at the time, that we'd get to where we are
today.
</instructor hat>
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20091110/1648c377/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list