[c-nsp] SP QoS Service Class

Jason Berenson jason at pins.net
Thu Nov 12 15:39:25 EST 2009


Travis,

This map has worked pretty well for us.  The idea behind splitting out 
RTP from signaling is if signaling doesn't get through, the call will 
drop.  I welcome constructive criticism.  :)

class-map match-any Core_Voice_Signaling
 match access-group name Core_Voice_Signaling
class-map match-any Core_Voice_RTP
 match access-group name Core_Voice_RTP
!
policy-map voice
 class Core_Voice_Signaling
  bandwidth percent 5
 class Core_Voice_RTP
  priority percent 70
 class class-default
  fair-queue
  random-detect dscp-based
!
ip access-list extended Core_Voice_RTP
 remark DSCP 24 = TOS 3
 permit udp any any dscp cs3
 remark DSCP ef
 permit udp any any dscp ef
ip access-list extended Core_Voice_Signaling
 remark MGCP Signaling
 permit udp any any eq 2727
 permit udp any eq 2727 any
 permit udp any any eq 2427
 permit udp any eq 2427 any
 remark Samsung Signaling
 permit udp any any eq 6000
 permit udp any eq 6000 any
 permit tcp any any eq 6100
 permit tcp any eq 6100 any
 remark Cisco Skinny Signaling
 permit udp any any eq 2000
 permit udp any eq 2000 any
 permit tcp any any eq 2000
 permit tcp any eq 2000 any
 remark Allworx Signaling
 permit udp any any eq 2088
 permit udp any eq 2088 any
 permit tcp any any eq 8081
 permit tcp any eq 8081 any
 remark ADIX Signaling
 permit tcp any any eq 50000
 permit tcp any eq 50000 any
 remark SIP Signalling
 permit udp any any eq 5060
 permit udp any eq 5060 any
 permit udp any any eq 5061
 permit udp any eq 5061 any
 permit tcp any any eq 5060
 permit tcp any eq 5060 any
 permit tcp any any eq 5061
 permit tcp any eq 5061 any
!

-Jason

Travis Marlow wrote:
> I'm trying to plan for a QoS implementation for an Internet Access provider.
> I just finished reading RFC 4594 and it recommends VoIP signalling traffic
> be marked CS5. Every other reference I have seen always has it at AF31 or
> CS3. Is anyone else using the RFC recommendation? Would any SP be willing to
> share a general configuration for service classes they have defined.
>
> Sorry for the duplicate, I sent from the wrong email address before.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>   


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list